Suchergebnisse

[EN] Recent developments of aDNA studies have had a powerful impact on European Prehistoric Archeology, both on practical and theoretical levels. One of its most perceptible effects has been the implicit -and in some cases explicit- rehabilitation of Gustav Kossinna's thought, a trend with ideological and political implications that should not be set aside. Beyond the need for a theoretical rearmament against what could be the foundations for a renovated scientific justification of new forms of racism, we must commit to an inquiry on the ways in which Archaeologists and Geneticist interact, situating what is undoubtedly a powerful scientific tool in the context of a critical archaeological practice, one committed to emancipatory values. ; Following this line of thought, we review the Neolithisation of Iberia as a paradigmatic case study. The long-lasting prevalence of interpretations based on the existence of a demic diffusion of some kind or another, grants any genetic data an unavoidable and crucial role in the theoretical debate, very specifically in relation to the discontinuities in genetic patterns between Mesolithic and Early Neolithic populations, and the putative Near Eastern connections of the earliest Neolithic groups. In this contribution we will examine the ways in which Archaeologists are interpreting the growing genetic evidence when building their historical narratives. Vice versa, we will take into account the ways in which Geneticists use the information provided by Archaeologists in order to historically organize their paleogenetic record. ; [ES] Los desarrollos recientes de los estudios sobre aDNA han tenido un potente impacto en la Arqueología prehistórica europea, tanto a nivel práctico como teórico. Uno de sus efectos más perceptibles ha sido la rehabilitación implícita, y en algunos casos explícita, del pensamiento de Gustav Kossinna, una tendencia cuyas implicaciones ideológicas y políticas hay que valorar. Más allá de la necesidad de un rearme teórico contra lo que podría ser el comienzo de una justificación científica de nuevas formas de racismo, debemos interrogarnos sobre las formas en las que los arqueólogos y los genetistas están interactuando para tratar de rescatar lo que sin duda es una potente herramienta de conocimiento para una práctica arqueológica crítica y comprometida con valores emancipatorios. ; En esta línea, se propone una revisión de los debates sobre la neolitización de Iberia como un caso paradigmático de estudio. El predominio desde antiguo en este campo de teorías migracionistas otorga a los datos genéticos un valor inevitable y crucial en el debate teórico. En concreto se refiere a las discontinuidades en los patrones genéticos entre las poblaciones del Mesolítico y del Neolítico inicial, y las reputadas conexiones con el Próximo Oriente de las primeras poblaciones neolíticas en relación con las explicaciones de la neolitización. Igualmente afecta la manera en la que los genetistas utilizan la información que los arqueólogos les proporcionan para organizar históricamente el registro paleogenético. En esta contribución examinaremos las formas en las que los arqueólogos están interpretando la creciente evidencia genética cuando construyen sus narrativas históricas. Vice versa tendremos en cuenta la manera en la que los genetistas utilizan la información proporcionada por los arqueólogos para organizar históricamente su registro paleogenético. ; Peer reviewed

[EN] This contribution completes the interview with Antonio Gilman Guillén, the first part of which was published in Trabajos de Prehistoria 77 (1). Gilman is an emeritus professor at California State University-Northridge, served as director of Trabajos de Prehistoria in 2015-2018, and has dedicated most of his work to the later prehistory of the Iberian peninsula. The subject of this second part falls into two parts. In the first Gilman reflects on how Spanish archaeology has developed during the decades of his work: his views on the nature of traditional archaeology during the Franco regime, the character of the discipline´s modernization, its more recent development, and the most important changes in the archaeological record. These issues are addressed on the basis of his experience as a foreign researcher in Spain and his own scholarly contributions, including his critical compilation of Iberian radiocarbon chronology. The second part addresses the intellectual context of his archaeological practice. He discusses his training as part of the second generation of the New Archaeology, the contribution of Marxism to the development of a critical, historically oriented functionalism, and the importance of theoretical antecedents such as Childe, Adams, and Wolf. In this context we review his opinions on some of the subjects that define his work as a prehistorian: the problems of the origins of social inequality, the political organization of "intermediate societies", and the "Upper Palaeolithic revolution". We also refer to the challenges presented by "archaeological science" and especially palaeogenetics and its influence on the revival of a culture-historical and diffusionist archaeology. Finally, there is an evaluation of the contrast between the European historicist tradition and the current state of North American anthropological archaeology. ; [ES] Esta contribución completa la entrevista con Antonio Gilman Guillén, cuya primera parte se publicó en Trabajos de Prehistoria 77 (1). Gilman es Profesor Emérito de la California State University-Northridge (EE. UU.), fue director de Trabajos de Prehistoria (2015-2018) y ha dedicado la mayor parte de su trabajo a la Prehistoria Reciente de la península ibérica. Los temas tratados en esta segunda entrega se agrupan en dos bloques. En el primero de ellos se plasman sus reflexiones sobre la experiencia de su relación con la Arqueología española. Se repasan sus opiniones sobre la arqueología tradicional bajo el franquismo, el proceso de modernización, con sus rasgos específicos, y las tendencias recientes y los cambios más relevantes en el registro arqueológico. Estas cuestiones se abordan desde su experiencia como investigador extranjero en España y sus propias contribuciones científicas. También se presta atención a su actividad como recopilador crítico de la cronología radiocarbónica ibérica. El segundo bloque se dedica al contexto intelectual de su práctica arqueológica. Se discuten sus raíces en la segunda generación de la New Archaeology y las aportaciones del marxismo a la consolidación de un funcionalismo crítico con sentido histórico y sus referentes teóricos en la obra de autores como Childe, Adams o Wolf. Se examinan en este contexto sus puntos de vista en relación con algunos de los temas que definen el campo de su trabajo como prehistoriador: los problemas del origen de la desigualdad social y el Estado, las formas políticas de las "sociedades intermedias" y la "Revolución del Paleolítico Superior". Se hace referencia también a los desafíos que presenta el desarrollo de la "ciencia arqueológica" y particularmente la paleogenética, y su influencia en el retorno de la arqueología histórico-cultural y difusionista. Finalmente, se valora la contraposición entre las tradiciones del historicismo europeo y la Arqueología antropológica norteamericana y el momento actual de esta última.

This contribution completes the interview with Antonio Gilman Guillén, the first part of which was published in Trabajos de Prehistoria 77 (1). Gilman is an emeritus professor at California State University-Northridge, served as director of Trabajos de Prehistoria in 2015-2018, and has dedicated most of his work to the later prehistory of the Iberian peninsula. The subject of this second part falls into two parts. In the first Gilman reflects on how Spanish archaeology has developed during the decades of his work: his views on the nature of traditional archaeology during the Franco regime, the character of the discipline´s modernization, its more recent development, and the most important changes in the archaeological record. These issues are addressed on the basis of his experience as a foreign researcher in Spain and his own scholarly contributions, including his critical compilation of Iberian radiocarbon chronology. The second part addresses the intellectual context of his archaeological practice. He discusses his training as part of the second generation of the New Archaeology, the contribution of Marxism to the development of a critical, historically oriented functionalism, and the importance of theoretical antecedents such as Childe, Adams, and Wolf. In this context we review his opinions on some of the subjects that define his work as a prehistorian: the problems of the origins of social inequality, the political rganization of "intermediate societies", and the "Upper Palaeolithic revolution". We also refer to the challenges presented by "archaeological science" and especially palaeogenetics and its influence on the revival of a culture-historical and diffusionist archaeology. Finally, there is an evaluation of the contrast between the European historicist tradition and the current state of North American anthropological archaeology. ; Esta contribución completa la entrevista con Antonio Gilman Guillén, cuya primera parte se publicó en Trabajos de Prehistoria 77 (1). Gilman es Profesor Emérito de la California State University-Northridge (EE. UU.), fue director de Trabajos de Prehistoria (2015-2018) y ha dedicado la mayor parte de su trabajo a la Prehistoria Reciente de la península ibérica. Los temas tratados en esta segunda entrega se agrupan en dos bloques. En el primero de ellos se plasman sus reflexiones sobre la experiencia de su relación con la Arqueología española. Se repasan sus opiniones sobre la arqueología tradicional bajo el franquismo, el proceso de modernización, con sus rasgos específicos, y las tendencias recientes y los cambios más relevantes en el registro arqueológico. Estas cuestiones se abordan desde su experiencia como investigador extranjero en España y sus propias contribuciones científicas. También se presta atención a su actividad como recopilador crítico de la cronología radiocarbónica ibérica. El segundo bloque se dedica al contexto intelectual de su práctica arqueológica. Se discuten sus raíces en la segunda generación de la New Archaeology y las aportaciones del marxismo a la consolidación de un funcionalismo crítico con sentido histórico y sus referentes teóricos en la obra de autores como Childe, Adams o Wolf. Se examinan en este contexto sus puntos de vista en relación con algunos de los temas que definen el campo de su trabajo como prehistoriador: los problemas del origen de la desigualdad social y el Estado, las formas políticas de las "sociedades intermedias" y la "Revolución del Paleolítico Superior". Se hace referencia también a los desafíos que presenta el desarrollo de la "ciencia arqueológica" y particularmente la paleogenética, y su influencia en el retorno de la arqueología histórico-cultural y difusionista. Finalmente, se valora la contraposición entre las tradiciones del historicismo europeo y la Arqueología antropológica norteamericana y el momento actual de esta última.

24 páginas. ; Cultural Heritage is a group of resources identified as a reflection of certain val-ues, beliefs, knowledge and tradition by a certain community. These resources are subject to management, preservation and diffusion through legislative and administrative means, which makes cultural heritage fall within the scope of Pro-tected sites, one of the spatial data themes established in Annex I of the INSPIRE Directive. The INSPIRE Data Specification on Protected Sites thus serves as the starting point for modelling cultural heritage information in order to implement, distribute and share it in an interoperable framework based on Spatial Data Infrastructures. Unfortunately, this data specification was primarily conceived for natural protected sites, which makes an extension necessary if it is to be applied to cultural features. This paper proposes an extension composed of three parts: one devoted to administrative information —including legal protection—, another describes the feature itself, and, a third part is dedicated to the inclusion of additional documentation (texts, images, etc.). ; The work presented here has been partially supported by the Spanish Government through the projects "Investigación en tecnologías para la valoración y conservación del Patrimonio Cultural" (CONSOLIDER INGENIO 2010CSD2007-00058) and SPATRIAL-"Definición de un Modelo para la Representación de Aspectos Espaciales del Patrimonio" (HAR2009-1226, Programa Nacional de I+D+I, Ministry of Science). ; Peer reviewed

Presentación oral realizada en el marco de la INSPIRE CONFERENCE 2012, celebrada en Estambul del 23 al 27 de junio de 2012. Se incluye un archivo pdf con la presentación de diaposivas exhibida durante la conferencia. ; Protected Sites are regarded as relevant data by the INSPIRE Directive, that includes them in the Annex I. The Protected Sites data specification has been developed by the Thematic Working Group on Protected Sites, focusing mainly on natural areas, connected to environmental data specifications under development in Annex III. Since Cultural Heritage data are included in the Protected Sites theme, guaranteeing their inclusion in the Directive is priority. Thus, the Cultural Heritage Application Schema presented in this paper is built as an interoperability framework for this particular kind of Protected Sites. It aims to offer a comprehensive support for heritage data publication via Spatial Data Infrastructures. The main issue that we try to tackle through this schema is interoperability, as long as Cultural Heritage data are geographical data, and also within the thematic scope of cultural heritage data. Spatial data interoperability is built upon conformance with the main ISO 19100 and INSPIRE documents, while we rely on other standards, such as CIDOC – CRM and Dublin Core to grant interoperability among other kind of cultural heritage data. The schema we put forward is designed as an extendable, generic and interoperable framework, an implementation basis for heritage spatial data with a known location, boundary and area, as stated in the Protected Sites Data Specification. The Protected Sites data specification is focused mainly on natural areas, Cultural Heritage being considered only in a superficial way. Thus, despite the fact that it offers a basic framework to implement interoperability on these data, some Cultural Heritage datasets would be left apart and others would not be correctly incorporated if taken as it comes. The main core of legislative data regarding protected heritage data finds its way within the Protected Sites class, with some minor adjustments, but troubles arise when trying to incorporate real – world entities, for there is no further development planned in any of the other INSPIRE Annexes. Hence the necessity to work on the legal definition of Cultural Heritage Protected Sites and, at the same time, on their thematic nature. We hope that this work might be helpful for a future development of Cultural Heritage SDIs in an interoperable framework based on OGC Standards, taking into account the spatial nature of this specific kind of Protected Sites Data to enhance their role within territorial governance, to help managing their protection and to bring them closer to the general public. ; Many individuals and organizations have contributed in this work: Juan M. Vicent (CCHS-CSIC) and Isabel del Bosque (CCHS-CSIC) as coordinators, Alfonso Fraguas, Antonio Uriarte, Juan Luis Pecharromán and María Ruiz del Árbol from the Instituto de Historia (CSIC), Emilio Abad from the Centro de Supercomputación de Galicia, Francisco García Cepeda from the Dirección General del Catastro, Marta Criado from the DMS Group, Pilar Chías Navarro and Tomás Abad Balboa from the Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Miguel Lage Reis-Correia from the Fundación Las Médulas – Junta de Castilla y León, Javier Márquez Piqueras from the IDR – Junta de Castilla La Mancha, Victorino Mayoral from the Instituto de Arqueología de Mérida – CSIC, Pastor Fábrega-Álvarez and César Parcero Oubiña from the Incipit – CSIC, Carlos Fernández Freire and Esther Pérez Asensio from the Unidad de SIG – CSIC, José Julio Zancajo from the Universidad de Salamanca and Antonio Vázquez Hoenhe, Arantza Respaldiza Hidalgo and Mercedes Farjas Abadía from the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. ; This work has been partially supported by the projects Investigación en tecnologías para la valoración y conservación del Patrimonio Cultural (CONSOLIDER INGENIO 2010 CSD2007-00058) and Definición de un modelo para la representación de aspectos espaciales del Patrimonio (National R&D Plan), and developed by a multidisciplinar team of experts in heritage, geomatics and other fields, gathered under the Spanish SDI Working Groups.

Comunicación presentada en el congreso "AGILE 2012. Bridging the Geographic Information Sciences", celebrado en Avignon del 24 al 27 de abril de 2012. Incluye un archivo comprimido en formato .zip con dos archivos en formato pdf, uno con el texto que formará parte de las actas del congreso y otro con el póster en tamaño DIN A0 que se expuso durante el mismo. ; One of the nine themes listed in Annex I of the INSPIRE Directive is "Protected Sites". The Protected Sites Data Specification has been developed by the Thematic Working Group on Protected Sites, focusing mainly on natural protected areas, connected to environmental data specifications under development in Annex III. What we present here is a Cultural Heritage Application Schema built as an interoperability framework for this particular kind of Protected Sites. It aims to offer a comprehensive support for heritage data publication via Spatial Data Infrastructures, trying to enable a complete management of all georeferenced Cultural Heritage data. ; This work has been partially supported by Spanish Government through the projects "Investigación en tecnologías para la valoración y conservación del Patrimonio Cultural" (CONSOLIDER INGENIO 2010 CSD2007-00058) and "Definición de un modelo para la representación de aspectos espaciales del Patrimonio" (National R&D Plan), and developed by a multidisciplinar team of experts in heritage, geomatics and other fields, gathered under the Spanish SDI Working Groups. ; Peer reviewed

Fernández Freire, Carlos; Parcero-Oubiña, César y Uriarte González, Antonio (eds.).-- Cadernos de Arqueoloxía e Patrimonio (CAPA) ; This monograph presents the background, context and technical details of an Application Schema for the inclusion of cultural heritage spatial data into the INSPIRE framework. Nowadays, INSPIRE provides the most relevant framework for the dissemination and exchange of geographical data, covering many different thematic fields, particularly relevant for envi-ronmental datasets. Although cultural heritage elements are partially addressed within INSPIRE, there is no specific documentation on how these data should be considered, structured and published. This text aims to provide technical guidelines for decision makers, public administrations and the scientific community for the definition and implementation of harmonized datasets for cultural heritage, according to the interoperability principles of INSPIRE. This monograph presents in full detail a data model and an application schema, some of whose aspects have been previously published in brief (Fernández Freire et al. 2013, Parcero-Oubiña et al. 2013, Uriarte González et al. 2013). ; This work has been partially supported by the Spanish Government through the projects "Investigación en tecnologías para la valoración y conservación del Patrimonio Cultural" (CONSOLIDER INGENIO 2010 CSD2007-00058) and SPATRIAL-"Definición de un Modelo para la Representación de Aspectos Espaciales del Patrimonio" (HAR2009-1226. Programa Nacional de I+D+I, Ministry of Science). Editorial funding: INCIPIT. ; Peer reviewed